ORDINANCE__________________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF MARIN AMENDING THE MARIN COUNTY CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 23.19 TO THE CODE BY ADDING SECTIONS 23.19.100. 23.19.110,
23.19.120, 23.19.130, 23.19.140, 23.19.150, 23.19.160, 23.19.170, 23.19.180,
23.19.190, 23.19.200, 23.19.210, 23.19.220, 23.19.230, PERTAINING TO THE MARIN COUNTY INTEGRATED PEST
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
The Board of Supervisors
of the County of Marin does hereby ordain as follows:
Marin County Integrated
Pest Management Program
Title 23 of the Marin County Code is hereby amended by
adding Chapter 23.19, INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM as follows:
Sections:
23.19.100 PURPOSE AND FINDINGS
23.19.101 POLICY
23.19.102 DEFINITIONS
23.19.103 PESTICIDE USE REDUCTION AND GUIDELINES FOR
PESTICIDE SELECTION
23.19.104 DESIGNATION OF INTEGRATED PEST (IPM) COORDINATOR
23.19.105 CREATION AND PURPOSE OF AN INTEGRATED PEST
MANAGEMENT
(IPM) COMMISSION
23.19.106 NOTIFICATION OF PESTICIDE USE
23.19.107 IMPLEMENTATION OF COUNTY INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT
POLICY
23.19.108 RECORD KEEPING OF PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS
23.19.109 EXEMPTIONS
23.19.110 IPM CONTRACTS
23.19.111 GUIDELINES
23.19.112 NO CRIMINAL PENALTIES OR SANCTIONS
23.19.113 NO CIVIL LIABILITY FOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS CHAPTER
Section I.
Section 23.19.100 of the Marin County Code shall read as follows:
SECTION 123.19.100. PURPOSE AND FINDINGSAND FINDINGS
The Board of Supervisors
hereby finds that it shall be the policy of
the County of Marin for County departments and pesticide applicators who apply
pesticides to property owned or managed by the County to eliminate
or reduce pesticide applications on County-owned and County-managed
property to the maximum extent feasible.The Board of Supervisors
finds that County departments and personnel, particularly the Department of Parks, Open Space, and Cultural Commission, Department of Public Works and Department of Agriculture, Weights and Measures, have taken steps to
successfully practice integrated pest management (“IPM”).
An IPM policy was adopted by the Department of Parks, Open Space, and Cultural Commission in 1983, which resulted
in significant overall reduction in use and elimination of the most hazardous
pesticides; established employee written safety programs; required appropriate
State pest control licensing and continuing education for employees; maintained
high compliance with Federal and State pest control laws and regulations Marin County had adopted; established
biological pest control; and adopted integrated pest management activities.
It is the purpose and intent of this chapter to
ensure that County departments and all those who apply pesticides to property
owned and/or managed by the County
of Marin utilize integrated pest management (IPM) practices, eliminate or
reduce pesticide applications on County-owned and/or County-managed property
to the maximum extent feasible, and take all reasonable measures to ensure that
pest control activities do not threaten environmental and human health.
(b) The Board of Supervisors
finds that some County departments and personnel, particularly the department
of Parks and Open Space, have already taken significant steps to successfully
adopt IPM practices. Under this chapter,
the County of Marin wishes to continue to be a leader for public and private
entities in the adoption of IPM, reduction in pesticide use, and protection of
public health.
(b) County departments shall
implement the following Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
policy:
It is the purpose and intent of this chapter to
practice integrated pest management (IPM) and reduce or eliminate pesticide use
on County-owned and managed property through selection of the most appropriate
reduce-risk practices for each site and situation involving local environmental
and economic considerations as well as consideration of effectiveness and
acceptability of practices.
This Ordinance applies to County departments which
utilize pesticides for maintenance of any County property or facility. It is the purpose and intent of this chapter
to practice integrated pest management (IPM) principals when considering the
use of pesticides on County-owned and managed property through selection of the
most appropriate reduced-risk practices for each site and situation involved
local environment and economic considerations, as well as consideration of
effectiveness and acceptability of practices.
Section II. Section 23.19.110 of the Marin County
Code shall read as follows:
23.19.110 County
Integrated Pest Management PolicyPOLICY
The County in carrying out
its pest management operations shall focus on long term prevention or
suppression of pest problems with minimum negative impact
on human health, non-target organisms, and the environment.
The goal of the County is to reduce its countywide
total yearly pesticide use by 75 percent (75%) by weight, as compared to the
total pesticide use in 1997, no later than January 1, 2004.
The County assume recognize that
pesticides are potentially hazardous to human human health, and the environmental health and the environment,,
and
non-target organisms. County
departments and shall give preference to reasonablye available
non-pesticide alternatives Integrated Pest Management (IPM) principals when
considering the use of pesticides on County property.property.and County departments shall should include the following
elements in the
County Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) approach outlined below.plans.
(1) Establish scouting or
inspection procedures to monitor pest population levels. Perform thorough in-field assessments of
each pest problem. Keep records of such
monitoring. Monitoring should be
performed by designated personnel or contractor
knowledgeable
in IPM methods.
(2) Establish for each pest an
IPM implementation plan which evaluates the biological, aesthetic, and economic
loss each site can tolerate (tolerance levels) and set pest population levels (action levels) at which corrective action should be taken to ensure that pests do not
exceed
tolerance levels. Monitor each pest ecosystem to determine pest
population size, occurrence, and natural enemy population, if present. Identify and evaluate conditions that
encourage pest problems. Identify
practices and decisions that could reduce pest populations. Keep records of such
monitoring. Monitoring should be
performed by designated personnel knowledgeable in IPM methods.
(3) Determine corrective actions when an action threshold is
reached. Review and consider all
available non-chemical options for acceptability and feasibility. Consider the use of chemicals only as a last
resort. Select and use chemicals only in accordance with State, Federal and local law an in
accordance this
chapter,
whichever is most restrictive. Select
reduced-risk practices least damaging to humans and the environment and most likely to produce a
permanent reduction in the supportive environment for the target pest(s). Use pest
resistant plants and planting systems that minimize pest infestations.
(4) Identify and evaluate
conditions that encourage pest problems.
Modify pest ecosystems to reduce food and living space through physical
and cultural
practices. Set for each pest at each site, and identify in an
IPM implementation plan, an injury level, based on how much biological,
aesthetic, or economic damage the site can tolerate.
(a) Use physical pest controls
such as cultivation, traps, and barriers
(exclusions).
(b)
Employ practices, including
watering,
mulching, waste management, and food storage to reduce pest populations.
(c)
Design and construct, or
modify, indoor and outdoor areas to reduce or eliminate pest habitats.
(d) Use pest resistant plants
and planting systems that minimize pest infections.
(e) Use biological pest
controls when possible.
(5) Determine most effective treatment time, based on
pest biology and other variables, such as weather, seasonal changes in wildlife
use, and local conditions. Perform thorough in-field
assessments of each pest problem.
(6) Establish and maintain an
accurate record-keeping system to catalog Determine most effective
treatment time, based on pest biology and other variables, such as weather,
seasonal changes in wildlife use, and local conditions.monitoring information and
to document and evaluate effectiveness of pest management procedures.
(7)Establish scouting or
inspection procedures to monitor pest population levels and severity of the
pest problem Evaluate
the effectiveness of the IPM program and make adjustments as needed.
(8). Mointor pest
management practices to evaluate effectiveness.
Conduct an ongoing education program for County
staff and members of the public. Modify pest ecosystems to
reduce food and living space. Modify
management practices, including watering, mulching, waste management, and food
storage to reduce pest populations.
Design and construct, or modify, indoor and outdoor areas to reduce or
eliminate pest habitats. Establish for each
pest an IPM implementation plan which evaluates biological, aesthetic, and
economic loss each site can tolerate to determine which corrective action(s)
must be implemented.
(a) Acquaint staff with IPM
principles, pest biology, non-chemical pest control alternatives including
new pest management strategies as they become known, and health and safety
issues, including toxicology of pesticides use.
(b) Inform
the public of the County’s program to reduce pesticide use, and respond to
questions from the public about the County’s pest management practices.
Use physical pest controls such as hand weeding,
traps, and barriers. Determine
corrective action(s) when a control action threshold is reached. Select specific reduced-risk practices least
damaging to the environment and most likely to produce a permanent reduction in
the supportive environment for the target pest(s), and most cost-effective
considering both short-and long-term objectives.
Modify pest ecosystems to reduce food and living
space through physical and cultural practices.
Use biological pest controls when possible.
(introducing or enhancing pests’ natural enemies).
Review and consider all available non-chemical
options for acceptability and feasibility.
Consider the use of chemicals only as a last resort. Select and use chemicals only within an IPM
program and in accordance with this chapter.
(10)
Conduct an ongoing education program of County staff and public utilizing
County facilities.
Acquaint staff with of IPM
principles, pest biologies, non-chemical pest control
alternatives including new pest management strategies as they
become known, and health and safety issues, including toxicology
of pesticides use. And inform the public of
the County’s program to reduce pesticide use.
Inform the public of the County’s program to reduce
pesticide use, and
respond to questions from the public about the County’s pest management
practices.
(8) Establish
and maintain an accurate record-keeping system to catalog monitoring
information and document management procedures. Monitor treatment to evaluate
effectiveness. Keep monitoring records
and include them in the IPM implementation plan.
Nothing in this chapter is intended to apply to
pesticide application that are required to comply with federal, state, or local
laws or regulations.
(9) Evaluate the effectiveness
of the IPM program and make adjustments as needed.
Section III. Section 23.19.120
of the Marin County Code shall read as follows:
SECTION 2. 23.19.120 DEFINITIONS.
(a) “Agricultural
Commissioner” means the County Agricultural Commissioner for the County of
Marin or designated agent, employee..
(b)
(b) “Antimicrobial agent” means any
substance or mixture of substances intended for prohibiting the growth of, or
destroying, any bacteria, fungi pathogenic to humans or other animals, or
viruses declared to be pests under the California Food and Agricultural Code
Section 12754.5, except slime control agents, substances intended for use in or
on humans or other animals, and use in or on processed food, beverages, or
pharmaceuticals. Antimicrobial agents include, but are not limited to,
disinfectants, sanitizers,
bacteriostats, sterilizerssterilizers,
fungicides and fungistats applied to
(b) inanimate surfaces, and commodity preservatives and
protectants applied to raw materials or manufactured products.
(c ) “Board” means the Marin County Board of
Supervisors and “Supervisor”
means a member of the Board of Supervisors.
(d ) “Contract”
means a binding written agreement, including but not limited to a contract,
lease, permit, license or easement, between a person, firm, corporation or
other entity, including a governmental entity, and a County department, which
grants a right to use or occupy property of the County of Marin for a specified
purpose or purposes,
or requires that the pesticides be applied.
(e) “County
IPM plans” means IPM implementation plans recommended by the IPM Commission
developed in cooperation with County departments, IPM Coordinator, and approved
by the Board..
(f) “Contractor”
means a person, firm, or corporation or other entity, including a governmental
entity, that enters into a contract as defined in (d ) of this section (2) © with a County department.
(g) “County
department” means any department of the County of Marin and includes pesticide
applicators hired by a County department to apply pesticides on County property.. County department does not include any other
local agency or any federal or state agency.
(h) “Integrated
Pest Management” and
“IPM” mean a decision-making process for managing pests that uses monitoring to
determine pest injury levels, and combines,
biological, cultural, mechanical, physical, and chemical tools and other management
practices to
control pests in a safe, cost effective, and environmentally sound manner that contributes to the protection of public health.
minimize health, environmental, and financial risks. This
method uses extensive knowledge about pests, such as infestations(,), thresholds, life
histories, environmental requirements, and natural enemies to complement and
facilitate biological and other natural control of pests. The method involves the uses the least toxic
synthetic pesticides only as a last resort for controlling pests use
of non-chemicalnonchemical
pest control methods and the careful use of least-toxic chemical methods when non-chemical
methods have been
exhausted or are not feasible.
(i)
“been
considered and evaluated.
“Pesticide” means pesticide as defined
in Section 12753 of Chapter 2 of Division 7 of the California Food and
Agricultural cCode.
(j ) “Pesticide applicator” means any person
or company hired by a County Department whoto
appliesy
pesticides to property owned and/or managed by the County of Marin.
(k )
“Toxicity Category II, II, III, IV product” means any pesticide product meeting the
appropriate toxicity categories and bearing on the front label panel the word
Danger, Warning, or Caution, as specirfied in
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Pesticide Product” means any pesticide product that
meets United Stated Environmental Protection Agency criteria for Toxicity
Category I under Section 156.10 of Part 156 of Title 4 of the Code of federal
regulations.
“Toxicity Category II
Pesticide Product” means any pesticide product that meets United States
Environmental Protection Agency criteria for Toxicity Category II under section
156.10 of Part 156 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Section IV.
Section 23.19.130 of the Marin County Code shall read as follows.
SECTION 3: 23.19.130 PESTICIDE USE REDUCTION
AND GUIDELINES
FOR PESTICIDE
SELECTION
.
(a) Except for pesticides
granted an exemption pursuant to Section 23.19.190, effective January 1, 1999,
no County department should use any Toxicity Category I or Toxicity Category II Pesticide product, any pesticide product containing an ingredient
known to the State of California to cause cancer, developmental toxicity, or
reproductive toxicity pursuant to the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic
Enforcement Act of 1986; any pesticide product containing an ingredient classified by
the United States Environmental Protection Agency as a human carcinogen,
probable human carcinogen, possible human carcinogen, reproductive toxin, or
developmental toxin.
(b) At such time that the
United States Environmental Protection Agency or the California Environmental
Protection Agency identify certain additional chemicals as known,
probable, or possible disrupters of the endocrine system, the IPM
Commission shall recommend to the Board of Supervisors that
the Board of Supervisors prohibit the use by County departments of pesticide products that
contain these chemicals unless an exemption is granted pursuant to Section
23.19.190.
(c )
Except for pesticides
granted an exemption pursuant to Section 9,
effective January 1, 1998 1999, no
County department shall use any Toxicity Category I Pesticide Product, any
pesticide containing an active ingredient
chemical identified by or intentionally added inert ingredient
known to the State of California as a chemical known to the
State to cause cancer, developmental toxicity, or
reproductive toxicity pursuant to the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic
Enforcement Act of 1986; , and any
pesticide product containing an active
ingredient or intentionally added inert ingredient
classified as a proven human carcinogen by the United States Environmental
Protection Agency as a human carcinogen, probable human carcinogen, possible
human carcinogen, reproductive toxin, or
developmental toxin; and any chemical
classified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency or the
California Environmental Protection Agency as a known, probable or possible
disrupter of the endocrine system. , Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances.
Except for pesticides
granted an exemption pursuant to Section 9,
effective January 1, 1999, 2000, no
County department shall use any Toxicity Category II pesticide product.
By January 1,, 2000, 20041, the County of Marin the County of Marin shall reduce
its total yearly
pesticide pesticide use by 75 percent (75%) by
weight, as compared to total pesticide use in 1997 except as directed by approved County IPM plans..
(d) For the purposes of
Section 23.19.130 (c ), the total pesticide use by the County Department of Parks, Open Space, and Cultural Services shall not include the
pesticide use in the following areas:
CSA-9 Northridge; CSA-17 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, Creekside Park, and
Bon Air Road; CSA 18 Adrian Rosal Park, Candys Park, and Pueblo Park; Fairfax
Library; Novato Library, Rush Creek Lighting and Landscape District; Strawberry
Point Lighting and Landscape District; Flood Zone 4 Pump Stations; and Flood Zone 9 Pump Stations, Civic Center Dog Park, and the McInnis Park Golf Center. The IPM Commission shall
set a pesticide use reduction target for these areas in consultation with the Department of Parks, Open Space, and
Cultural Services.
(e) Any County Department may
request amendments
to the approved County IPM plans. The
IPM Commission will act upon those
requests in a timely manner, at a properly noticed public hearing. The IPM Commission shall forward its
recommendations regarding requests for amendments to the Board of Supervisors
for considerations. The Board of Supervisors shall
act upon the IPM Commission’s recommendation.
Any amendment to an IPM plan will require approval by the Board of Supervisors. Category III pesticide use by 50 percent (50%) by weight as
compared to total pesticide use in 1998.
(f) Category
IV Pesticides shall be evaluated on a case by case basis for specific risks
associated with use. The IPM Commission shall establish a list of reduced-risk Category III and IV pesticides that are consistent for use in a least-toxic
IPM program. These pesticides shall be exempt from sections 23.19.130(c ).
(a)
The availability of alternatives shall be
evaluated.
Section V. Section
23.19.140 of the Marin County Code shall read as follows:
SECTION 4. 23.19.140 DESIGNATION
OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) COORDINATOR.
The County Agricultural Commissioner is designated
the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Coordinator. The IPM coordinator will be primarily responsible for
implementing the County IPM policy.